MRF Policies: Return a {:reject, reason} instead of {:reject, nil}
This commit is contained in:
parent
f918b6f86d
commit
858d9fc7e8
|
@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ def filter(%{"type" => "Follow", "actor" => actor_id} = message) do
|
||||||
if score < 0.8 do
|
if score < 0.8 do
|
||||||
{:ok, message}
|
{:ok, message}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
{:reject, nil}
|
{:reject, "[AntiFollowbotPolicy] Scored #{actor_id} as #{score}"}
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -39,14 +39,13 @@ def filter(%{"type" => "Create", "actor" => actor, "object" => object} = message
|
||||||
{:ok, message}
|
{:ok, message}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{:old_user, false} ->
|
{:old_user, false} ->
|
||||||
{:reject, nil}
|
{:reject, "[AntiLinkSpamPolicy] User has no posts nor followers"}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{:error, _} ->
|
{:error, _} ->
|
||||||
{:reject, nil}
|
{:reject, "[AntiLinkSpamPolicy] Failed to get or fetch user by ap_id"}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
e ->
|
e ->
|
||||||
Logger.warn("[MRF anti-link-spam] WTF: unhandled error #{inspect(e)}")
|
{:reject, "[AntiLinkSpamPolicy] Unhandled error #{inspect(e)}"}
|
||||||
{:reject, nil}
|
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ defp delist_message(message, _threshold), do: {:ok, message}
|
||||||
defp reject_message(message, threshold) when threshold > 0 do
|
defp reject_message(message, threshold) when threshold > 0 do
|
||||||
with {_, recipients} <- get_recipient_count(message) do
|
with {_, recipients} <- get_recipient_count(message) do
|
||||||
if recipients > threshold do
|
if recipients > threshold do
|
||||||
{:reject, nil}
|
{:reject, "[HellthreadPolicy] #{recipients} recipients is over the limit of #{threshold}"}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
{:ok, message}
|
{:ok, message}
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ def filter(%{"type" => "Create", "object" => %{"type" => object_type}} = message
|
||||||
{:ok, message} <- delist_message(message, delist_threshold) do
|
{:ok, message} <- delist_message(message, delist_threshold) do
|
||||||
{:ok, message}
|
{:ok, message}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
_e -> {:reject, nil}
|
e -> e
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ defp check_reject(%{"object" => %{"content" => content, "summary" => summary}} =
|
||||||
if Enum.any?(Pleroma.Config.get([:mrf_keyword, :reject]), fn pattern ->
|
if Enum.any?(Pleroma.Config.get([:mrf_keyword, :reject]), fn pattern ->
|
||||||
string_matches?(content, pattern) or string_matches?(summary, pattern)
|
string_matches?(content, pattern) or string_matches?(summary, pattern)
|
||||||
end) do
|
end) do
|
||||||
{:reject, nil}
|
{:reject, "[KeywordPolicy] Matches with rejected keyword"}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
{:ok, message}
|
{:ok, message}
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
@ -89,8 +89,9 @@ def filter(%{"type" => "Create", "object" => %{"content" => _content}} = message
|
||||||
{:ok, message} <- check_replace(message) do
|
{:ok, message} <- check_replace(message) do
|
||||||
{:ok, message}
|
{:ok, message}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
_e ->
|
{:reject, nil} -> {:reject, "[KeywordPolicy] "}
|
||||||
{:reject, nil}
|
{:reject, _} = e -> e
|
||||||
|
_e -> {:reject, "[KeywordPolicy] "}
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -12,8 +12,9 @@ def filter(%{"type" => "Create"} = message) do
|
||||||
reject_actors = Pleroma.Config.get([:mrf_mention, :actors], [])
|
reject_actors = Pleroma.Config.get([:mrf_mention, :actors], [])
|
||||||
recipients = (message["to"] || []) ++ (message["cc"] || [])
|
recipients = (message["to"] || []) ++ (message["cc"] || [])
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if Enum.any?(recipients, fn recipient -> Enum.member?(reject_actors, recipient) end) do
|
if rejected_mention =
|
||||||
{:reject, nil}
|
Enum.find(recipients, fn recipient -> Enum.member?(reject_actors, recipient) end) do
|
||||||
|
{:reject, "[MentionPolicy] Rejected for mention of #{rejected_mention}"}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
{:ok, message}
|
{:ok, message}
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ defp check_date(%{"object" => %{"published" => published}} = message) do
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
defp check_reject(message, actions) do
|
defp check_reject(message, actions) do
|
||||||
if :reject in actions do
|
if :reject in actions do
|
||||||
{:reject, nil}
|
{:reject, "[ObjectAgePolicy]"}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
{:ok, message}
|
{:ok, message}
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
@ -47,9 +47,8 @@ defp check_delist(message, actions) do
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{:ok, message}
|
{:ok, message}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
# Unhandleable error: somebody is messing around, just drop the message.
|
|
||||||
_e ->
|
_e ->
|
||||||
{:reject, nil}
|
{:reject, "[ObjectAgePolicy] Unhandled error"}
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
{:ok, message}
|
{:ok, message}
|
||||||
|
@ -69,9 +68,8 @@ defp check_strip_followers(message, actions) do
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{:ok, message}
|
{:ok, message}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
# Unhandleable error: somebody is messing around, just drop the message.
|
|
||||||
_e ->
|
_e ->
|
||||||
{:reject, nil}
|
{:reject, "[ObjectAgePolicy] Unhandled error"}
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
{:ok, message}
|
{:ok, message}
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ def filter(%{"type" => "Create"} = object) do
|
||||||
{:ok, object}
|
{:ok, object}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
true ->
|
true ->
|
||||||
{:reject, nil}
|
{:reject, "[RejectNonPublic] visibility: #{visibility}"}
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ defp check_accept(%{host: actor_host} = _actor_info, object) do
|
||||||
accepts == [] -> {:ok, object}
|
accepts == [] -> {:ok, object}
|
||||||
actor_host == Config.get([Pleroma.Web.Endpoint, :url, :host]) -> {:ok, object}
|
actor_host == Config.get([Pleroma.Web.Endpoint, :url, :host]) -> {:ok, object}
|
||||||
MRF.subdomain_match?(accepts, actor_host) -> {:ok, object}
|
MRF.subdomain_match?(accepts, actor_host) -> {:ok, object}
|
||||||
true -> {:reject, nil}
|
true -> {:reject, "[SimplePolicy] host not in accept list"}
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ defp check_reject(%{host: actor_host} = _actor_info, object) do
|
||||||
|> MRF.subdomains_regex()
|
|> MRF.subdomains_regex()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if MRF.subdomain_match?(rejects, actor_host) do
|
if MRF.subdomain_match?(rejects, actor_host) do
|
||||||
{:reject, nil}
|
{:reject, "[SimplePolicy] host in reject list"}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
{:ok, object}
|
{:ok, object}
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ defp check_report_removal(%{host: actor_host} = _actor_info, %{"type" => "Flag"}
|
||||||
|> MRF.subdomains_regex()
|
|> MRF.subdomains_regex()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if MRF.subdomain_match?(report_removal, actor_host) do
|
if MRF.subdomain_match?(report_removal, actor_host) do
|
||||||
{:reject, nil}
|
{:reject, "[SimplePolicy] host in report_removal list"}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
{:ok, object}
|
{:ok, object}
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ def filter(%{"type" => "Delete", "actor" => actor} = object) do
|
||||||
|> MRF.subdomains_regex()
|
|> MRF.subdomains_regex()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if MRF.subdomain_match?(reject_deletes, actor_host) do
|
if MRF.subdomain_match?(reject_deletes, actor_host) do
|
||||||
{:reject, nil}
|
{:reject, "[SimplePolicy] host in reject_deletes list"}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
{:ok, object}
|
{:ok, object}
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
@ -177,7 +177,9 @@ def filter(%{"actor" => actor} = object) do
|
||||||
{:ok, object} <- check_report_removal(actor_info, object) do
|
{:ok, object} <- check_report_removal(actor_info, object) do
|
||||||
{:ok, object}
|
{:ok, object}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
_e -> {:reject, nil}
|
{:reject, nil} -> {:reject, "[SimplePolicy]"}
|
||||||
|
{:reject, _} = e -> e
|
||||||
|
_ -> {:reject, "[SimplePolicy]"}
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -191,7 +193,9 @@ def filter(%{"id" => actor, "type" => obj_type} = object)
|
||||||
{:ok, object} <- check_banner_removal(actor_info, object) do
|
{:ok, object} <- check_banner_removal(actor_info, object) do
|
||||||
{:ok, object}
|
{:ok, object}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
_e -> {:reject, nil}
|
{:reject, nil} -> {:reject, "[SimplePolicy]"}
|
||||||
|
{:reject, _} = e -> e
|
||||||
|
_ -> {:reject, "[SimplePolicy]"}
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -134,12 +134,13 @@ defp process_tag(
|
||||||
if user.local == true do
|
if user.local == true do
|
||||||
{:ok, message}
|
{:ok, message}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
{:reject, nil}
|
{:reject,
|
||||||
|
"[TagPolicy] Follow from #{actor} tagged with mrf_tag:disable-remote-subscription"}
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
defp process_tag("mrf_tag:disable-any-subscription", %{"type" => "Follow"}),
|
defp process_tag("mrf_tag:disable-any-subscription", %{"type" => "Follow", "actor" => actor}),
|
||||||
do: {:reject, nil}
|
do: {:reject, "[TagPolicy] Follow from #{actor} tagged with mrf_tag:disable-any-subscription"}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
defp process_tag(_, message), do: {:ok, message}
|
defp process_tag(_, message), do: {:ok, message}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ defp filter_by_list(%{"actor" => actor} = object, allow_list) do
|
||||||
if actor in allow_list do
|
if actor in allow_list do
|
||||||
{:ok, object}
|
{:ok, object}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
{:reject, nil}
|
{:reject, "[UserAllowListPolicy] #{actor} not in the list"}
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -11,22 +11,26 @@ def filter(%{"type" => "Undo", "object" => child_message} = message) do
|
||||||
with {:ok, _} <- filter(child_message) do
|
with {:ok, _} <- filter(child_message) do
|
||||||
{:ok, message}
|
{:ok, message}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
{:reject, nil} ->
|
{:reject, _} = e -> e
|
||||||
{:reject, nil}
|
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def filter(%{"type" => message_type} = message) do
|
def filter(%{"type" => message_type} = message) do
|
||||||
with accepted_vocabulary <- Pleroma.Config.get([:mrf_vocabulary, :accept]),
|
with accepted_vocabulary <- Pleroma.Config.get([:mrf_vocabulary, :accept]),
|
||||||
rejected_vocabulary <- Pleroma.Config.get([:mrf_vocabulary, :reject]),
|
rejected_vocabulary <- Pleroma.Config.get([:mrf_vocabulary, :reject]),
|
||||||
true <-
|
{_, true} <-
|
||||||
Enum.empty?(accepted_vocabulary) || Enum.member?(accepted_vocabulary, message_type),
|
{:accepted,
|
||||||
false <-
|
Enum.empty?(accepted_vocabulary) || Enum.member?(accepted_vocabulary, message_type)},
|
||||||
length(rejected_vocabulary) > 0 && Enum.member?(rejected_vocabulary, message_type),
|
{_, false} <-
|
||||||
|
{:rejected,
|
||||||
|
length(rejected_vocabulary) > 0 && Enum.member?(rejected_vocabulary, message_type)},
|
||||||
{:ok, _} <- filter(message["object"]) do
|
{:ok, _} <- filter(message["object"]) do
|
||||||
{:ok, message}
|
{:ok, message}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
_ -> {:reject, nil}
|
{:reject, _} = e -> e
|
||||||
|
{:accepted, _} -> {:reject, "[VocabularyPolicy] #{message_type} not in accept list"}
|
||||||
|
{:rejected, _} -> {:reject, "[VocabularyPolicy] #{message_type} in reject list"}
|
||||||
|
_ -> {:reject, "[VocabularyPolicy]"}
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ test "matches followbots by nickname" do
|
||||||
"id" => "https://example.com/activities/1234"
|
"id" => "https://example.com/activities/1234"
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{:reject, nil} = AntiFollowbotPolicy.filter(message)
|
assert {:reject, "[AntiFollowbotPolicy]" <> _} = AntiFollowbotPolicy.filter(message)
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
test "matches followbots by display name" do
|
test "matches followbots by display name" do
|
||||||
|
@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ test "matches followbots by display name" do
|
||||||
"id" => "https://example.com/activities/1234"
|
"id" => "https://example.com/activities/1234"
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{:reject, nil} = AntiFollowbotPolicy.filter(message)
|
assert {:reject, "[AntiFollowbotPolicy]" <> _} = AntiFollowbotPolicy.filter(message)
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -50,7 +50,8 @@ test "rejects the message if the recipient count is above reject_threshold", %{
|
||||||
} do
|
} do
|
||||||
Pleroma.Config.put([:mrf_hellthread], %{delist_threshold: 0, reject_threshold: 2})
|
Pleroma.Config.put([:mrf_hellthread], %{delist_threshold: 0, reject_threshold: 2})
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{:reject, nil} = filter(message)
|
assert {:reject, "[HellthreadPolicy] 3 recipients is over the limit of 2"} ==
|
||||||
|
filter(message)
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
test "does not reject the message if the recipient count is below reject_threshold", %{
|
test "does not reject the message if the recipient count is below reject_threshold", %{
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -25,7 +25,8 @@ test "rejects if string matches in content" do
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
assert {:reject, nil} == KeywordPolicy.filter(message)
|
assert {:reject, "[KeywordPolicy] Matches with rejected keyword"} =
|
||||||
|
KeywordPolicy.filter(message)
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
test "rejects if string matches in summary" do
|
test "rejects if string matches in summary" do
|
||||||
|
@ -39,7 +40,8 @@ test "rejects if string matches in summary" do
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
assert {:reject, nil} == KeywordPolicy.filter(message)
|
assert {:reject, "[KeywordPolicy] Matches with rejected keyword"} =
|
||||||
|
KeywordPolicy.filter(message)
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
test "rejects if regex matches in content" do
|
test "rejects if regex matches in content" do
|
||||||
|
@ -55,7 +57,8 @@ test "rejects if regex matches in content" do
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{:reject, nil} == KeywordPolicy.filter(message)
|
{:reject, "[KeywordPolicy] Matches with rejected keyword"} ==
|
||||||
|
KeywordPolicy.filter(message)
|
||||||
end)
|
end)
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -72,7 +75,8 @@ test "rejects if regex matches in summary" do
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{:reject, nil} == KeywordPolicy.filter(message)
|
{:reject, "[KeywordPolicy] Matches with rejected keyword"} ==
|
||||||
|
KeywordPolicy.filter(message)
|
||||||
end)
|
end)
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ test "to" do
|
||||||
"to" => ["https://example.com/blocked"]
|
"to" => ["https://example.com/blocked"]
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
assert MentionPolicy.filter(message) == {:reject, nil}
|
assert MentionPolicy.filter(message) ==
|
||||||
|
{:reject, "[MentionPolicy] Rejected for mention of https://example.com/blocked"}
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
test "cc" do
|
test "cc" do
|
||||||
|
@ -88,7 +89,8 @@ test "cc" do
|
||||||
"cc" => ["https://example.com/blocked"]
|
"cc" => ["https://example.com/blocked"]
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
assert MentionPolicy.filter(message) == {:reject, nil}
|
assert MentionPolicy.filter(message) ==
|
||||||
|
{:reject, "[MentionPolicy] Rejected for mention of https://example.com/blocked"}
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ test "it's rejected when addrer of message in the follower addresses of user and
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Pleroma.Config.put([:mrf_rejectnonpublic, :allow_followersonly], false)
|
Pleroma.Config.put([:mrf_rejectnonpublic, :allow_followersonly], false)
|
||||||
assert {:reject, nil} = RejectNonPublic.filter(message)
|
assert {:reject, _} = RejectNonPublic.filter(message)
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ test "it's reject when direct messages aren't allow" do
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Pleroma.Config.put([:mrf_rejectnonpublic, :allow_direct], false)
|
Pleroma.Config.put([:mrf_rejectnonpublic, :allow_direct], false)
|
||||||
assert {:reject, nil} = RejectNonPublic.filter(message)
|
assert {:reject, _} = RejectNonPublic.filter(message)
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ test "has a matching host" do
|
||||||
report_message = build_report_message()
|
report_message = build_report_message()
|
||||||
local_message = build_local_message()
|
local_message = build_local_message()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
assert SimplePolicy.filter(report_message) == {:reject, nil}
|
assert {:reject, _} = SimplePolicy.filter(report_message)
|
||||||
assert SimplePolicy.filter(local_message) == {:ok, local_message}
|
assert SimplePolicy.filter(local_message) == {:ok, local_message}
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ test "match with wildcard domain" do
|
||||||
report_message = build_report_message()
|
report_message = build_report_message()
|
||||||
local_message = build_local_message()
|
local_message = build_local_message()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
assert SimplePolicy.filter(report_message) == {:reject, nil}
|
assert {:reject, _} = SimplePolicy.filter(report_message)
|
||||||
assert SimplePolicy.filter(local_message) == {:ok, local_message}
|
assert SimplePolicy.filter(local_message) == {:ok, local_message}
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ test "activity has a matching host" do
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
remote_message = build_remote_message()
|
remote_message = build_remote_message()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
assert SimplePolicy.filter(remote_message) == {:reject, nil}
|
assert {:reject, _} = SimplePolicy.filter(remote_message)
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
test "activity matches with wildcard domain" do
|
test "activity matches with wildcard domain" do
|
||||||
|
@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ test "activity matches with wildcard domain" do
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
remote_message = build_remote_message()
|
remote_message = build_remote_message()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
assert SimplePolicy.filter(remote_message) == {:reject, nil}
|
assert {:reject, _} = SimplePolicy.filter(remote_message)
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
test "actor has a matching host" do
|
test "actor has a matching host" do
|
||||||
|
@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ test "actor has a matching host" do
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
remote_user = build_remote_user()
|
remote_user = build_remote_user()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
assert SimplePolicy.filter(remote_user) == {:reject, nil}
|
assert {:reject, _} = SimplePolicy.filter(remote_user)
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ test "is not empty but activity doesn't have a matching host" do
|
||||||
remote_message = build_remote_message()
|
remote_message = build_remote_message()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
assert SimplePolicy.filter(local_message) == {:ok, local_message}
|
assert SimplePolicy.filter(local_message) == {:ok, local_message}
|
||||||
assert SimplePolicy.filter(remote_message) == {:reject, nil}
|
assert {:reject, _} = SimplePolicy.filter(remote_message)
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
test "activity has a matching host" do
|
test "activity has a matching host" do
|
||||||
|
@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ test "it accepts deletions even from non-whitelisted servers" do
|
||||||
test "it rejects the deletion" do
|
test "it rejects the deletion" do
|
||||||
deletion_message = build_remote_deletion_message()
|
deletion_message = build_remote_deletion_message()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
assert SimplePolicy.filter(deletion_message) == {:reject, nil}
|
assert {:reject, _} = SimplePolicy.filter(deletion_message)
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ test "it rejects the deletion" do
|
||||||
test "it rejects the deletion" do
|
test "it rejects the deletion" do
|
||||||
deletion_message = build_remote_deletion_message()
|
deletion_message = build_remote_deletion_message()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
assert SimplePolicy.filter(deletion_message) == {:reject, nil}
|
assert {:reject, _} = SimplePolicy.filter(deletion_message)
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.TagPolicyTest do
|
||||||
describe "mrf_tag:disable-any-subscription" do
|
describe "mrf_tag:disable-any-subscription" do
|
||||||
test "rejects message" do
|
test "rejects message" do
|
||||||
actor = insert(:user, tags: ["mrf_tag:disable-any-subscription"])
|
actor = insert(:user, tags: ["mrf_tag:disable-any-subscription"])
|
||||||
message = %{"object" => actor.ap_id, "type" => "Follow"}
|
message = %{"object" => actor.ap_id, "type" => "Follow", "actor" => actor.ap_id}
|
||||||
assert {:reject, nil} = TagPolicy.filter(message)
|
assert {:reject, _} = TagPolicy.filter(message)
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ test "rejects non-local follow requests" do
|
||||||
actor = insert(:user, tags: ["mrf_tag:disable-remote-subscription"])
|
actor = insert(:user, tags: ["mrf_tag:disable-remote-subscription"])
|
||||||
follower = insert(:user, tags: ["mrf_tag:disable-remote-subscription"], local: false)
|
follower = insert(:user, tags: ["mrf_tag:disable-remote-subscription"], local: false)
|
||||||
message = %{"object" => actor.ap_id, "type" => "Follow", "actor" => follower.ap_id}
|
message = %{"object" => actor.ap_id, "type" => "Follow", "actor" => follower.ap_id}
|
||||||
assert {:reject, nil} = TagPolicy.filter(message)
|
assert {:reject, _} = TagPolicy.filter(message)
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
test "allows non-local follow requests" do
|
test "allows non-local follow requests" do
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -26,6 +26,6 @@ test "rejected if allow list isn't empty and user not in allow list" do
|
||||||
actor = insert(:user)
|
actor = insert(:user)
|
||||||
Pleroma.Config.put([:mrf_user_allowlist], %{"localhost" => ["test-ap-id"]})
|
Pleroma.Config.put([:mrf_user_allowlist], %{"localhost" => ["test-ap-id"]})
|
||||||
message = %{"actor" => actor.ap_id}
|
message = %{"actor" => actor.ap_id}
|
||||||
assert UserAllowListPolicy.filter(message) == {:reject, nil}
|
assert {:reject, _} = UserAllowListPolicy.filter(message)
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ test "it does not accept disallowed child objects" do
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{:reject, nil} = VocabularyPolicy.filter(message)
|
{:reject, _} = VocabularyPolicy.filter(message)
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
test "it does not accept disallowed parent types" do
|
test "it does not accept disallowed parent types" do
|
||||||
|
@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ test "it does not accept disallowed parent types" do
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{:reject, nil} = VocabularyPolicy.filter(message)
|
{:reject, _} = VocabularyPolicy.filter(message)
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ test "it rejects based on parent activity type" do
|
||||||
"object" => "whatever"
|
"object" => "whatever"
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{:reject, nil} = VocabularyPolicy.filter(message)
|
{:reject, _} = VocabularyPolicy.filter(message)
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
test "it rejects based on child object type" do
|
test "it rejects based on child object type" do
|
||||||
|
@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ test "it rejects based on child object type" do
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{:reject, nil} = VocabularyPolicy.filter(message)
|
{:reject, _} = VocabularyPolicy.filter(message)
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
test "it passes through objects that aren't disallowed" do
|
test "it passes through objects that aren't disallowed" do
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue