Notes:
- QuestionValidator didn't have a :name field but that seems like a mistake
- `_fields` functions can't inherit others because of some Validators
- bto/bcc fields were absent in activities, also seems like a mistake
(Well IIRC we don't or barely support bto/bcc anyway)
* Policies were put under a new module (Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.Policy instead of Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF), but this wasn't changed in the Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF @mrf_config_descriptions
* I don't have a unit test to prevent similar problems in the future because I don't find a proper way to do it
* The descriptions in the unit tests are defined in the unit tests, so if someone changes module names in the code, the tests wont see it
* The list is generated in Pleroma.Docs.Generator.list_behaviour_implementations, but I can't do a check in the when clause of the function to see if the provided module is a behaviour or not.
Backport of: https://git.pleroma.social/pleroma/pleroma/-/merge_requests/3509
The original approach to search in GIN indexes is to use
`to_tsvector(text)` in the WHERE clause of the query. According to
postgres docs [pdoc], this method does not make use of the index,
while `to_tsvector(config, text)` does. This commit changed the
query to use the two-argument `to_tsvector()`.
[pdoc]: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/textsearch-tables.html
To obtain the search config in use, we make a query to the db first.
The `::regconfig::oid` hack is needed because Postgrex does not support
regconfig type directly [postgrexbug]. I use the conversion from and to
`oid` instead of `text` because I tested in the actual DB and querying
using the conversion via `text` is slow just as the one-argument
`to_tsvector()` variant.
[postgrexbug]: https://github.com/elixir-ecto/postgrex/issues/502
Backport of: https://git.pleroma.social/pleroma/pleroma/-/merge_requests/3519
Closes: https://git.pleroma.social/pleroma/pleroma/-/issues/2758
* To see what front ends are installed, it ls static/frontends. When this folder doesn't exists yet, it will return an empty array.
* Installing still works since the folder is created during installation already
Backport of: https://git.pleroma.social/pleroma/pleroma/-/merge_requests/3510
The original approach to search in GIN indexes is to use
`to_tsvector(text)` in the WHERE clause of the query. According to
postgres docs [pdoc], this method does not make use of the index,
while `to_tsvector(config, text)` does. This commit changed the
query to use the two-argument `to_tsvector()`.
[pdoc]: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/textsearch-tables.html
To obtain the search config in use, we make a query to the db first.
The `::regconfig::oid` hack is needed because Postgrex does not support
regconfig type directly [postgrexbug]. I use the conversion from and to
`oid` instead of `text` because I tested in the actual DB and querying
using the conversion via `text` is slow just as the one-argument
`to_tsvector()` variant.
[postgrexbug]: https://github.com/elixir-ecto/postgrex/issues/502
BUG: https://git.pleroma.social/pleroma/pleroma/-/issues/2758
* To see what front ends are installed, it ls static/frontends. When this folder doesn't exists yet, it will return an empty array.
* Installing still works since the folder is created during installation already
* Policies were put under a new module (Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.Policy instead of Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF), but this wasn't changed in the Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF @mrf_config_descriptions
* I don't have a unit test to prevent similar problems in the future because I don't find a proper way to do it
* The descriptions in the unit tests are defined in the unit tests, so if someone changes module names in the code, the tests wont see it
* The list is generated in Pleroma.Docs.Generator.list_behaviour_implementations, but I can't do a check in the when clause of the function to see if the provided module is a behaviour or not.
* I also added for keywordpolicy as well now. It was done in the admin-fe, but is better to be done here
* I also added comments to explain why we did the _info keys (backwards compatibility)
Added a new field in the nodeinfo called quarantined_instances_info
This holds an object like `"quarantined_instances_info":{"quarantined_instances":{"quar.inst":{"reason":"whatever reason"}}}}`
It's easiest (and imo most proper) to use tuples {"instance, "reason"} in BE,
but for FE maps like %{"instance": "instance", "reason", "reason"} are better.
I changed it so that node_info returns maps now for simple_policy and quarantined instances.
When a setting was deprecated, the code would stop checking for the rest of the possible deprications. This also meant that the settings weren't rewritten to the new settings for deprecated settings besides the first one.
Finn Behrens
Mark Felder